Humane Intelligence
Scorecard
Public red-teaming exercises with NIST and IMDA; societal harms rather than catastrophic risk.
Nonprofit, New York, US. Independent referee; listed with independent referees. Confidence med. Domains: misuse, jailbreak.
No floor triggered 8/8 evidenced · Retrieved & confirmed Scores by preset: Lab procurement –; Regulator or auditor –; Public trust –; Equal weights –. Weakest evidenced dimension: access depth (lab-granted) 0/4. No evidenced dimension below 2 — not a pass. No floor triggered means no disqualifying conflict is on file, not a pass. Full evidence.
The weighted numbers are hidden until you ask for them: two readers with different priorities see different numbers, and neither is the site's.
What would move the score. Pre-release access for the harms it covers.
- Funding 3 to 4: score –
- Governance 2 to 3: score –
- Personnel 2 to 3: score –
Dissent, lower. Access should be 0. No pre-release access is documented anywhere: the public exercises, bias bounties and NIST and IMDA partnerships tested deployed models, no system card names Humane Intelligence as a pre-release tester, and no lab engagement is on record. The card shows 1 only because the anchor-0 claim lacks a quoted span (C15), not because anything above public access was ever granted.
Dissent, higher. Access should be 2. Humane Intelligence co-ran the NIST ARIA pilot and the Singapore IMDA multilingual red-teaming exercise, in which participating developers supplied models under government programs; A.4 treats government testing agreements as 3. If those exercises gave structured access beyond the public API, even with safeguards on, the documented engagement is at least anchor 2.
Each value is the tightest admissible cap or, with no cap, the highest admissible floor, under RULES.md. The binding signal is highlighted. A dash means no admissible signal sets a bound under the Retrieved & confirmed policy.
- Government partners rather than lab clients. floors at 3 by F.9binding“Humane Intelligence would not be able to do its important work without the support of our funders”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14
- Nonprofit. floors at 2 by G.1binding“Humane Intelligence is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to breaking down barriers to AI deployment for social good”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14
- No lab roles found. floors at 2 by P.6
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14 - Humane Intelligence's advisory group includes a Senior Research Scientist at Meta, and its board president previously worked on OpenAI's Human Data team; no recusal or cooling-off rule is published. caps at 2 by P.4binding“Dr. Diego Garcia-Olano Senior Research Scientist, Meta”
Board & Advisory - Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026-07) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-15 - Document request: Request to Humane Intelligence: the board and advisory-group conflict-of-interest policy, and whether advisory-group members employed by a model developer recuse from evaluations involving that developer's models.
- Document request: Request to Humane Intelligence: whether any cooling-off rule applies to directors previously employed by a model developer, and the dates of the board president's OpenAI employment as stated in the published bio.
- Public-model access only. caps at 0 by A.6binding“Humane Intelligence has run more than 30 red teaming, bias bounty, and contextual evaluations”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14
- Designs its own exercises. floors at 3 by S.5binding“We collaboratively design and run rigorous evaluations”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14
- Publishes openly; public exercises. floors at 3 by R.5binding“In September 2026, we released our AI red teaming app as an open source software.”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14
- Methods published. floors at 2 by M.2binding“using our own software, which we are releasing under an open source software license in 2026”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14
- No commercial products. floors at 4 by X.7
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-14 - Humane Intelligence sells red-teaming events and contextual evaluations as paid services using its own software, and invites clients to 'hire us'; the client list is not published. caps at 2 by X.1binding“Humane Intelligence offers red teaming events as a paid service using our own software”
Humane Intelligence (Humane Intelligence, 2026) tier 3 self (humane)confirmed2026-09-15 - Document request: Request to Humane Intelligence: a list of paid red-teaming and contextual-evaluation clients since 2024, or a statement of whether any client is a frontier developer.
Values under each evidence policy
| Dimension | Leads included | Retrieved & confirmed | Against interest | Verified spans | Primary only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funding | 3 | 3 | – | 3 | – |
| Governance | 2 | 2 | – | 2 | – |
| Personnel | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | – |
| Access depth (lab-granted) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Scope control | 3 | 3 | – | 3 | – |
| Publication rights | 3 | 3 | – | 3 | – |
| Method transparency | 2 | 2 | – | 2 | – |
| Role incompatibility | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | – |
| Score, Lab procurement | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 3/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – Unevidenced, 0/8 |
| Score, Regulator or auditor | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 3/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – Unevidenced, 0/8 |
| Score, Public trust | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 3/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – Unevidenced, 0/8 |
| Score, Equal weights | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – No floor triggered, 3/8 | – No floor triggered, 8/8 | – Unevidenced, 0/8 |
Traced money and ties
no inflow rows yet. Confirmed rows: 0 of 0 Dollar sums: confirmed + unaudited USD rows only; imported figures are not re-derived and never summed. Second hop traced for 0 of 0 sources. Ties: none within two steps recorded. Checked and not found: 0.
Ledger
No rows yet. Add one in data/ledger/.
Funding graph, focused
Every one-way chain to a lab and to an evaluator at full strength, everything else faded. Hover any name to trace its connections; click a name to open its page.