Evaluator Bench
evaluator; distance from a lab: 2

AVERI

Scorecard

Standards body for frontier AI auditing; ran the first double-blind enclave evaluation of a proprietary model.

Nonprofit, Washington, US. Independent referee; listed with independent referees. Confidence med. Domains: assurance.

No floor triggered 8/8 evidenced · Retrieved & confirmed Scores by preset: Lab procurement –; Regulator or auditor –; Public trust –; Equal weights –. Weakest evidenced dimension: access depth (lab-granted) 0/4. No evidenced dimension below 2 — not a pass. No floor triggered means no disqualifying conflict is on file, not a pass. Full evidence.

The weighted numbers are hidden until you ask for them: two readers with different priorities see different numbers, and neither is the site's.

What would move the score. Funder disclosure and a first audit under statutory terms.

Dissent, lower. Access is at the floor; no lower notch exists. The public record supports 0: AVERI's only completed engagement queried Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, a model public since July 2025, inside an enclave that hid the weights from the auditors, and the report says the pilot addressed some but not all ways a developer could tamper with the evaluation. No pre-release checkpoint, safeguards-off run, log or on-site access appears anywhere on the record.

Dissent, higher. Access could be 1. AVERI reports API credits from six labs "as donations or compensation" and says it is pursuing pilots on whether companies follow their own safety and security frameworks; Google DeepMind ran a proprietary model for it inside a trusted execution environment it did not control. A nonpublic endpoint or pre-release checkpoint in the current pilots would meet anchor 1, and the enclave protocol is a documented route to deeper access.

Each value is the tightest admissible cap or, with no cap, the highest admissible floor, under RULES.md. The binding signal is highlighted. A dash means no admissible signal sets a bound under the Retrieved & confirmed policy.

Funding 3/4
Anchor 3: Mostly philanthropic or public money; some lab-linked pooled funds.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
Capped at 3 by averi.06 (F.12): Funding sources not fully itemized publicly.; capped at 3 by averi.11 (F.6): AIUC, a funder, was seeded by an Anthropic co-founder; Halcyon's CEO chairs Transluce's board; Coefficient's principal is an Anthropic investor. Two of the named funders are two steps from labs.; capped at 3 by averi.14 (F.7): AVERI accepts and has received donations from current and former non-executive employees and alumni of frontier AI companies; amounts are not disclosed.. Floors up to 3 from averi.09, averi.12 do not exceed the cap.
Curator: Anchor 3: philanthropic and diversified with named funders and a no-majority rule; lab-employee donations and two lab-adjacent funders keep it off anchor 4.
Governance 3/4
Anchor 3: Nonprofit or public body with a COI policy.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
Floored at 3 by averi.13 (G.2): Published conflict-of-interest rules: all employees, board members and contractors disclose conflicts on starting and biannually; material conflicts trigger mandatory recusal or declining the engagement; no cash donations or compensation are accepted from frontier AI companies or their executives; lab API credits and lab-employee donations are disclosed; the most significant conflicts are disclosed publicly.. No admissible signal caps it.
Curator: Anchor 3: 501(c)(3) nonprofit (averi.02). No tier-1 source for an independent board or external review, so 4 is unearned under the tier rule (C10).
Personnel 3/4
Anchor 3: Recusal policy and disclosure of lab ties.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
Capped at 3 by averi.04 (P.3): Founder and several staff come from labs and lab-adjacent institutions.. Floors up to 3 from averi.10 do not exceed the cap.
Curator: Anchor 3: recusal policy with a stated cooling-off for the director and disclosed ties; short of anchor 4 because the cooling-off is person-specific rather than a standing rule.
Access depth (lab-granted) 0/4
Anchor 0: Public API only.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
mechanism: lab-controlled
Capped at 0 by averi.16 (A.1): AVERI's only completed engagement evaluated Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, a publicly released model, inside a secure enclave that hid the weights; no pre-release, safeguards-off, helpful-only, log or on-site access has been documented.. Floors up to 0 from averi.01 do not exceed the cap.
Scope control 3/4
Anchor 3: Evaluator sets scope and can add questions.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
Capped at 3 by averi.05 (S.4): Pilot audits are voluntary and lab-selected; not yet a full-time auditor..
Publication rights 2/4
Anchor 2: Publishes; lab reviews with broad redaction.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
mechanism: lab-controlled
Capped at 2 by averi.15 (R.2): The findings of the only completed pilot were delivered to Google DeepMind as a confidential report; the public pilot report describes the protocol and the types of successes and failure modes without quantitative results, prompts or outputs.. Floors up to 2 from averi.07 do not exceed the cap.
Method transparency 3/4
Anchor 3: Tasks or code partly open.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
Floored at 3 by averi.03 (M.1): Publishes pilot reports and open tooling; framework paper with AI Assurance Levels.. No admissible signal caps it.
Role incompatibility 3/4
Anchor 3: Tools are open or free to the ecosystem.
evidence: tier 3 (self)
Floored at 3 by averi.08 (X.4): No commercial products; tools open source.. No admissible signal caps it.

Values under each evidence policy

DimensionLeads includedRetrieved & confirmedAgainst interestVerified spansPrimary only
Funding3333–
Governance33–3–
Personnel3333–
Access depth (lab-granted)0000–
Scope control3333–
Publication rights2222–
Method transparency3333–
Role incompatibility33–3–
Score, Lab procurement– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 6/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– Unevidenced, 0/8
Score, Regulator or auditor– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 6/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– Unevidenced, 0/8
Score, Public trust– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 6/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– Unevidenced, 0/8
Score, Equal weights– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– No floor triggered, 6/8– No floor triggered, 8/8– Unevidenced, 0/8

Traced money and ties

hop 1: 1 row; hop 2: 2 rows; unattributed: 1 row. Confirmed rows: 4 of 4 Dollar sums: confirmed + unaudited USD rows only; imported figures are not re-derived and never summed. Second hop traced for 3 of 4 sources: untraced Halcyon Futures. Ties: none within two steps recorded. Checked and not found: 2.

Ledger

Money in

Checked and not found

  • N17 Is any single donor a majority of AVERI's funding?
    Searched organization's own funding disclosure, snapshot 2026-09-14: no single donor is a majority of funding. Prompted by AVERI's own funding page (averi.09). confirmedhttps://www.averi.org/about
  • N20 Is there a discrete Coefficient Giving grant page for AVERI?
    Searched coefficientgiving.org/grants, name search, snapshot 2026-09-15: no discrete Coefficient Giving grant page for AVERI found, although AVERI names Coefficient as a funder. Prompted by AVERI names Coefficient as a funder (averi.12). unauditedhttps://coefficientgiving.org/

Roles hosted

Funding graph, focused

Every one-way chain to a lab and to an evaluator at full strength, everything else faded. Hover any name to trace its connections; click a name to open its page.

The funding graph around AVERI Teal lines are money (transfers); amber lines are roles. Solid: confirmed; dashed: imported. Hover a name to trace its chains to the labs and evaluators — each chain runs one way across the columns, never doubling back; hover a line for the row. Every element is a row in data/ledger/. Labs Direct lab ties Two steps Three or more Public or unattributed Evaluators Amazon Anthropic G42 Google / Google DeepMind Meta Microsoft OpenAI Thinking Machines Lab xAI AI Safety Fund (Frontier Model Alexandr Wang Andreessen Horowitz Anthropic employees (personal Ben Mann D.E. Shaw Ventures David Farhi Dustin Moskovitz Frontier-lab employees and alu Holden Karnofsky Jaan Tallinn Jeffrey Ladish Macroscopic Ventures (formerly Miles Brundage Neil Chowdhury Nvidia OpenAI employees (personal hol OpenAI Foundation Peter Mattson Sequoia Capital Zico Kolter Adam Gleave Artificial Intelligence Underw Clement Delangue Coefficient Giving (formerly O Good Ventures Foundation Jason Droege Longview Philanthropy Marco Mascorro Paul Christiano Rajiv Dattani Survival and Flourishing Fund Conrad Stosz Dan Hendrycks Mike McCormick Alec Radford Alignment Research Center Constellation Research Center ELMA Philanthropies Emerson Collective EU budget (Digital Europe Prog Fifty Years (50Y) Founders Pledge Founders Pledge (frontier AI f Gates Foundation Halcyon Futures High Tide Foundation Hillspire (Schmidt family offi Hudson River Trading Jacob Hilton MacKenzie Scott Magarac Venture Partners Obvious Ventures Redpoint Ventures Renaissance Philanthropy Salesforce Ventures Samsung Next Schmidt Sciences Silicon Valley Community Found Skoll Foundation Snowflake Ventures Swish Ventures Sympatico Ventures The Audacious Project (TED) UK government (DSIT) US government (NIST appropriat Valhalla Foundation Vanguard Charitable Wing Venture Capital Y Combinator Andon Labs Apollo Research AVERI Center for AI Safety Epoch AI EquiStamp EU AI Office FAR.AI Gray Swan Hugging Face Open Alignment In Irregular (formerly Pattern La METR Microsoft AI Red Team MLCommons Nemesys Insights Palisade Research RAND Corporation Redwood Research SaferAI Scale AI (SEAL) SecureBio Transluce UK AI Security Institute US CAISI (NIST)